A royal expert has recently accused Meghan Markle of treating her life in Montecito, California, like a “prom event,” with Prince Harry as “the prom king.” This accusation suggests that Meghan orchestrates events for the couple to attend together, portraying an image that some critics find superficial and staged.

Charlotte Griffiths, the editor-at-large for the Mail on Sunday, voiced this sentiment on the Palace Confidential show. “I get the impression that life for Meghan Markle at the moment is a sort of prom event and [Harry] is the prom king and she’s the prom queen, and she’s setting up all these events over the years that they can attend together,” Griffiths said.

The latest in this series of events is the ESPY Awards, scheduled for July 11, where Prince Harry will receive the Pat Tillman Award for Service. This accolade recognizes his efforts in making a positive impact on the veteran community through sports. However, the decision to honor him with this award has sparked controversy. Critics argue that Harry’s contributions do not measure up to the legacy of Pat Tillman, the former footballer who left his sports career to serve in the military after 9/11 and was killed in Afghanistan.

A Change.org petition, initiated by Patti Mickel, calls for ESPN to reconsider awarding the Pat Tillman Award to Prince Harry. Mickel argues that the award should embody Tillman’s values and honor someone who has demonstrated unwavering dedication to their team and country, much like Tillman did.

Royal expert Tom Quinn has also weighed in, telling The Mirror that Prince Harry misses his home country and his friends, many of whom refuse to visit him due to their dislike for Meghan. This sentiment adds another layer to the perception that Harry’s life in California is somewhat detached from his roots and former relationships.

Harry and Meghan live in California with their children, Prince Archie, 5, and Princess Lilibet, 3. Despite the idyllic setting and the couple’s public appearances, the narrative of a glamorous “prom event” life contrasts sharply with the internal and external criticisms they face.

The notion that Meghan is “setting up” events for her and Harry to attend reflects a broader skepticism about the authenticity of their public life. Critics argue that these orchestrated appearances are more about maintaining a certain image rather than engaging in genuine, impactful endeavors.

This controversy around the ESPY Awards and the broader accusations against Meghan Markle highlight the ongoing tension between the couple’s public persona and the scrutiny they face. While some view their efforts as meaningful contributions to various causes, others see them as calculated moves to remain in the spotlight.

In conclusion, the criticism that Meghan Markle treats her California life like a “prom event” underscores the challenges she and Prince Harry face in balancing their public image with genuine engagement in their new roles outside the British royal family. As the couple navigates these dynamics, the debate over their intentions and the value of their contributions continues to unfold.